Wednesday, June 28, 2023

ATROCITIES IN THE NAME OF RELIGION


 

ATROCITIES IN THE NAME OF RELIGION

 

 

Indian army soldiers on patrol in Manipur Unspeakable atrocities are taking place in various countries: This photo from the CNN article "Eleven killed in Manipur as new bout of ethnic violence grips India’s northeast" shows Indian soldiers calmly patrolling in Manipur, northwest India. But the intro "Eleven people have been shot dead and 14 injured in a fresh outbreak of ethnic violence that has gripped the northeast Indian state of Manipur" does not convey the horrors that Indian Christians are experiencing. Nor does the article "Manipur Christians: ‘The Violence Has Shattered Us’" from Christianity Today shake us from our complacent neutrality.

An Indian pastor in our "Morning Prayers and Readings" Skype group posted some videos about the anti-Christian violence in Manipur, asked for prayers, for spreading this info, and any support if possible. After searching online to verify these reports and and finding the above articles, it turns out this anti-Christian violence has been ongoing for a few months now: I hadn't heard a peep about it in the news and the few articles I found don't convey the awfulness of these persecutions. So I downloaded these videos and saved them on my Google Drive. But Google notified me that 2 of these videos "may violate Google Drive's Violence and Gore policy." So I moved them from my Google Drive and uploaded them to my server. They are terrible to watch, but just reading about these atrocities doesn't make much of an impression: we can walk away and forget about it. Here are 5 of the videos:
www.agape-biblia.org/Christians-houses-destroyed.mp4
www.agape-biblia.org/Christians-beaten-with-slippers.mp4
www.agape-biblia.org/Christians-murdered-along-the-road.mp4
www.agape-biblia.org/Christian-woman-tortured-and-executed.mp4
www.agape-biblia.org/Christians-march-for-108-victims.mp4

The news media do not want us to see the actual "Violence and Gore" that's taking place in the world: they want us believe that we can all get along if we just go along, feeling "warm fuzzies" by being insulated from the truth. We can also allow ourselves to be lulled into complacency by the latest news about Russia's invasion of Ukraine: our eyes glaze over and our attention drifts away to the next news report about the weather or a warm-fuzzy, feel-good story. On February 18, 2023, Reuters reported that the "U.S. declares Russia committed 'crimes against humanity' in Ukraine" – why did it take 12 months to come to that official announcement, after the genocide in Bucha?

It is finally being covered in major news outlets: the BBC reported on June 27 – "Ukraine war: Russia executed 77 civilians detained by its forces, UN says" and showed a photo of an apartment building that was demolished by a Russian missile. It mentioned that "the UN documented 864 individual cases of arbitrary detention by Russia since it launched its invasion last February. Ukraine also violated international law by detaining civilians, though on a much smaller scale." We should be careful not to adopt a "moral equivalency" or "but Ukraine is as bad as Russia" view out of this: 91% of all atrocities in the UN report were by Russia.

The Guardian reported on June 27, 2023 – "UN says Russian forces have tortured and executed civilians in Ukraine" saying – "the UN human rights office... interviewed hundreds of victims and witnesses for a report detailing more than 900 cases of civilians, including children and elderly people, being arbitrarily detained in the conflict, most of them by Russia." It also stated – "Yevgeny Prigozhin, the leader of the Wagner mercenary group, had implicated Vladimir Putin in war crimes by admitting the original invasion had not been justified by any provocative actions by Ukraine."

And Deutsche Welle also reported on June 26, 2023 – "Ukraine: German judiciary takes on Russian war criminals" describing how "hundreds of people in Ukraine have been sexually assaulted by Russian soldiers since the invasion of their country began. Now, for the first time, four alleged perpetrators are in the sights of Germany's justice system." Human rights lawyers in Europe are preparing cases against these perpetrators and their superiors, two high-ranking commanders.

Even before and especially since this war flared up on February 24, 2022, we learned that it has had a religious dimension: acccording to "How the Ukraine war is dividing Orthodox Christians" from over a year ago, March 7, 2022, "both sides of the conflict are not merely Christian, they are members of the same church, sharing a thousand years of religious history. Today, 71% of Russians and 78% of Ukrainians identify as Orthodox Christians. In fact, until 2019, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) was part of the Moscow Patriarchate (MP), and many parishes remain there (UOC-MP), in conflict with a self-governing Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU)," At the war's flare-up in 2022, Metr. Onufriy of the UOC-MP denounced it as a "fratricidal war" and many of his parishes refrained from commemorating their mother church's head, Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill, just like Kirill and his subordinates stopped commemorating the Ecumenical Patriarch. This signaled a break in communion: schism. Since then, hundreds of UOC-MP parishes have switched to the OCU.

See also the article – "The Russian-Ukrainian War is Now a Theological Crisis" of April 30, 2023. It explains that "symfonia" – the ideal of a harmonious relationship betwee church and state – has become the theological justification for the Russian state using its captive Orthodox Church to provide the theological-ideological basis for Russia's invasion. Ukraine, on the other hand, although it has a higher percentage of Orthodox believers than Russia, doesn't exercise such tight bonds between church and state: all religious confessions can freely practice their faith.

"Russian Invasion Reveals Fissures Among Orthodox Christians," a March 3, 2022 article on "Religion Unplugged," tells how this war has provoked schism in Eastern Orthodoxy worldwide: "Statements from the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, the Serbian Orthodox Church, the Church of Antioch and the Church of Jerusalem have asked for prayers for peace without naming Russia as an aggressor. On the other hand, statements from the Romanian Orthodox Church, the Georgian Orthodox Church, the Greek Orthodox Church and, of course, the Orthodox Church of Ukraine have more directly criticized Russia or President Vladimir Putin."

Our last issue of ARC-News closed with the quip – "Taking a middle of the road position is dangerous. You can get knocked down by the traffic from both ways." Some issues require a decision: "Not to decide is to decide." If we do not speak out and take action against atrocities that use religion as a justification, we are tacitly supporting these atrocities. Mouthing meaningless aphorisms such as "thoughts and prayers" or "prayers for peace and harmony" is nothing less than meaningless religious mouthwash that you gargle, spit out, and rinse down the drain. War crimes are being committed in the name of religion. It is time to take a stand against this anti-Christian violence!

Go to ARC-News to read our free e-newsletters and Subscribe!

Saturday, June 17, 2023

RESPECTING THE PERSONHOOD OF ALL HUMANS


 

Respecting the Personhood of All Humans

 

 

personhood "I AM the Lord." This phrase is repeated over and over again in chapters 18 and 19 of Leviticus. Chapter 18 is mostly concerned with rules of sexual morality and after every group of rules comes the phrase "I AM the Lord." But in Leviticus 19:9-18 we find rules about our ordinary social relationships:

9 When you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not wholly reap the corners of your field, neither shall you gather the gleanings of your harvest.
10 You shall not glean your vineyard, neither shall you gather the fallen grapes of your vineyard; you shall leave them for the poor and for the foreigner. I am the Lord your God.
11 You shall not steal; neither shall you deal falsely, nor lie to one another.
12 You shall not swear by my name falsely, and profane the name of your God. I am the Lord.
13 You shall not oppress your neighbor, nor rob him. The wages of a hired servant shall not remain with you all night until the morning.
14 You shall not curse the deaf, nor put a stumbling block before the blind; but you shall fear your God. I am the Lord.
15 You shall do no injustice in judgment: you shall not be partial to the poor, nor show favoritism to the great; but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor.
16 You shall not go up and down as a slanderer among your people; neither shall you stand against the life of your neighbor. I am the Lord.
17 You shall not hate your brother in your heart. You shall surely rebuke your neighbor, and not bear sin because of him.
18 You shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the children of your people; but you shall love your neighbor as yourself. I am the Lord.

Notice the special care for the poor, the deaf, and the blind. What do we see here? Because of the "I AM" we can have objective rules for living – family relationships, wider social relationships, and business relationships – that are not just subjective, based on our feelings and "what's in it for number one." Because God – the "I AM" – exists, we can have an objective, solid foundation for morality and truth. This is because humans are unique among all living creatures: we are created in the image of God, intended to reflect His nature and His glory. This life on planet Earth is intended to be a testing ground for our eternal life with God.

There's much talk these days about animal rights and the rights of nature, the environment. We humans are to treat these other creations with care and respect because God created mankind to be stewards over all the earth. But only human persons have the God-given rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (in the sense of eternal bliss).

The very first God-given right is the right to life. This comes before the right to liberty because without life we have no liberty. Today's "Right to Life" movement understands this, but the "Right to Freedom of Choice" group doesn't seem to grasp this fundamental fact. Liberty or freedom is not the right to unjustly deprive other persons of their life. The "Freedom of Choice" folks in politics and the abortion industry actually limit this freedom to just one choice: killing unborn babies.

They argue that personhood doesn't exist until the baby is born or develops self-awareness, which begins at about the age of 18 months, so it's OK to kill the baby before then. A balanced article on this is What is 'personhood'? The ethics question that needs a closer look in abortion debates. Another criterion they list is the ability to think logically, but this would exclude people who are unconscious long-term (in a "persistent vegetative state") or with limited intellectual ability. So they sometimes conclude that it is OK to euthanize these adults, although many "Pro Choice" people find that is going too far down the slippery slope of un-personhood.

The Right to Life isn't limited to the beginning of life, to unborn babies (not a "fetus" or "lump of tissue" – very dehumanizing terms), but also to those approaching the end of life, as I've discussed in PCHETA, THE SENATE’S DEADLY PALLIATIVE CARE BILL, IS BACK ON THE TABLE and elsewhere: "MAiD" (Medical Assistance in Dying) and turning palliative care into hospice care and then into euthanasia.

So "Respecting the Personhood of All Humans" concerns the whole spectrum o human life, from birth to childhood, adolescence, adulthood. and old age. It means treating each person with respect, just as we would like them to treat us: "you shall love your neighbor as yourself."

Go to ARC-News to read our free e-newsletters and Subscribe!

Friday, June 2, 2023

HANDLING ACCURATELY THE WORD OF TRUTH


 

HANDLING ACCURATELY THE WORD OF TRUTH

 

 

rightly dividing the word of truth This picture aptly illustrates the issue at hand: can every cowherd and every milkmaid correctly understand and interpret the Scriptures? Or does the King James Version's wording give us a hint of what can happen? "Dividing" can mean causing division: many illustrations I looked at showed a vertical sword stabbed into a Bible and one picture actually showed the mathematical symbol for division! Staking one's own position on a mistaken interpretation can cause division. What does the Bible really say about this, why have we come to the point where many insist that their personal view is the only right one and if you disagree they disown you?

The wording in the above title – "handling accurately the word of truth" – is from the NASB version, a very exact and accurate Evangelical translation. In 2 Timothy 2:15, the Apostle Paul is instructing Timothy how to shepherd the flocks in the region of Ephesus, where Paul had appointed him (1 Tim. 1:3) to ordain leaders in the churches there (1 Tim. 3: 1-10), just as Paul and appointed Titus to do in the churches on the island of Crete (Titus 1:5-7). This illustrates the apostolic oversight over churches to insure that correct doctrine is being accurately taught: Timothy and Titus were both to fulfill this apostolic function.

Paul wrote to the church in Thessalonica to "stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught, whether by word of mouth or by letter from us" (2 Thes. 2:15). And he instructed Timothy to "guard that which is traditioned to you, turning away from the empty chatter and oppositions of falsely so called knowledge; which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with you. Amen" (1 Tim. 6:20-21). The word "tradition" is "paradosis" in Greek, meaning that which is passed down from one person in authority to another. Also note "by word of mouth" – in the first 15 centuries of the Church, written copies of Scripture were rare and expensive, so much "traditioning" was oral from one generation of apostolic teachers to the next.

When Jesus was tempted right after His baptism, the devil mis-quoted Scripture to challenge Jesus to show off His power – see Mat. 4:5-7. Over and over in the New Testament we are warned to guard against false teachers and teachings. There are hundreds if not thousands of mistaken answers to a problem in higher math, but only one right answer: the same is true of Christian doctrine. Jesus told the Sadducees – "You are mistaken, not understanding the Scriptures, or the power of God" (Mat. 22:29).

The Apostle Peter wrote that "no prophecy of Scripture is of private interpretation, just as no prophecy ever came by the will of man: but holy men of God spoke, being moved by the Holy Spirit" (1 Pet. 1:20-21). Notice the connecting words "just as": in the same way, or just as, holy men of God spoke, so also we need "holy men of God" – saints and Church Fathers, those recognized by the Church – to correctly interpret Scripture. Not "every cowherd and every milkmaid" can do it correctly.

St. Peter also wrote that the wise writings of the Apostle Paul were sometimes hard to understand – "our beloved brother Paul also, according to the wisdom given to him, wrote to you; as also in all of his letters, speaking in them of these things. In those are some things hard to be understood, which the ignorant and unsettled twist, as they also do to the other Scriptures, to their own destruction" (2 Pet. 3:15b-16).

Finally, St. Paul instructs Titus how to train new elders – "holding to the faithful word which is according to the teaching, that he may be able to exhort in the sound doctrine, and to convict those who contradict him. For there are also many unruly men, vain talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, whose mouths must be stopped; men who overthrow whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for dishonest gain's sake." (Titus 1:9-11).

There are those whose mistaken ideas contradict sound doctrine: unruly, vain talkers and deceivers who are seeking self-gratification. But there are also those who are able to exhort in the sound doctrine. Let us strive to become the latter, by the example of the Apostles and their successors!

Go to ARC-News to read our free e-newsletters and Subscribe!

 


 

THE PITFALLS OF MODERNITY

  THE PITFALLS OF MODERNITY     (Click the photo.) A pitfall means falling off a cliff into a pit. As the article THE IDEOLOGY OF MODER...